Search "user:SquareTableKnight"

I've encountered the sound problem several times on the web version as well. But on puzzles.

1. Never heard of Hwo (chinese grandmaster?) 2. Pragg 3. Someone has to be the best

@Cedur216 said in #26: > >I think you misunderstood him. He probably meant to say that he solved 3379 puzzles and his rating on puzzles is around 1800.No. I checked the profile, you can see it yoursel…

@Cedur216 said in #24: > +650 in one day. Easiest puzzles for you still are 2700 at this stage which is very very difficult. If you were able to get 3300 without cheating then I would have done so a l…

@gmaayushdas said in #19: > im 3379 on puzzle and around 1800 rating what should i do to get rid of ? You can't try to go down about 200 rating points as I did. Then you get back to normal rating and …

@Cedur216 said in #13: > Might see it this way, if your puzzle rating got that high, why are you not improving at normal chess? I used to farm #2s and #3s until I realised there's hardly any point in …

At least lichess should make it clear how it works. Like what am I not allowed to do if I don't want to be marked with that question mark.

@thibault said in #8: > The point of chess rating is to give you puzzles (or opponents) that match your current level. Rating is not the goal, it is a tool to improve your chess experience. The goal i…

@mkubecek said in #6: > I don't think this "?" mark is handled internally the same as unreliable rating. IMHO the motivation here is to discourage people who would resort to various forms of cheating …

@Brian-E said in #4: > should not be allowed to affect the puzzle ratings too much. This it not players' problem. Lichess should resolve this in a proper way.