@PaWnBaRiaN He was not cb'd for posting that so that is no censorship technically speaking.
Agreed absolutely @PaWnBaRiaN
"censorship is not compatible with free libre world lichess , get rekt by my karma downvote"
It is destructive to the community and members.
Now they have pre-emptively -- I dunno what you would call it but the next step before closing a thread -- preventing it from bumping up.
"censorship is not compatible with free libre world lichess , get rekt by my karma downvote"
It is destructive to the community and members.
Now they have pre-emptively -- I dunno what you would call it but the next step before closing a thread -- preventing it from bumping up.
A_01 if you have inside knowledge tell us lol. You don't know what he was c'banned for or not c'banned for, unless I'm mistaken?
@agnivo2008
"#63 I feel that they will hardly do something on @tpr appeal because if they unbanned @tpr then there will a lot questions asked on lichess."
Correct. They will never reply any more. Unless it's to say how wonderful a decision this type of thing really is.
"#63 I feel that they will hardly do something on @tpr appeal because if they unbanned @tpr then there will a lot questions asked on lichess."
Correct. They will never reply any more. Unless it's to say how wonderful a decision this type of thing really is.
@mvz3 I don't have any inside knowledge. I'm just saying that we can't come to hasty conclusions using logic.
I feel that mods should give the reasons, one after one account is getting banned ( maybe there is a reason) and we don't know that did he/she unfollowed the TOS or there is something else. We are asking the reasons because the user is claiming that they are innocent and Mods are claiming that they are not innocent , so who is saying the truth? Public needs to know the truth.
I highly doubt that the mods will actually do what #63 said. But I think the fact that they are following regular protocol on every single lichess user has resulted in a "one-size-does-not-fit-all" situation. The mods need to reveal at least some part of the reason.
But he wasn't banned for saying those messages, @PaWnBaRiaN, He was literally telling us his thoughts. A mod chatbanned his account, then he said those things. There must be a reason before.
The wider issue here is not just that we have no idea why tpr specifically is being treated this way. That's one thing, but the wider issue is that we have no idea in general what kinds of behaviour might lead to that punishment. That means we have little choice but to live in fear of it happening to us, too.
Those who are innocent have nothing to fear, but this particular event has lead many people to question what "innocent" even means. If we don't know what "innocent" means, then we don't know if we should be afraid, and the default reaction to that situation is fear (or at least gnawing anxiety).
(Even now, I am left wondering if I will be picked on for speaking up like this. I wager the answer is no, but the thought is there, and that's the problem. The forum doesn't feel safe.)
Those who are innocent have nothing to fear, but this particular event has lead many people to question what "innocent" even means. If we don't know what "innocent" means, then we don't know if we should be afraid, and the default reaction to that situation is fear (or at least gnawing anxiety).
(Even now, I am left wondering if I will be picked on for speaking up like this. I wager the answer is no, but the thought is there, and that's the problem. The forum doesn't feel safe.)
i dont give a damn about what he said. "i might even not agree with what he said. but i support his right to say it." if i wanna say that lichess sucks and argue, thats my freedom and also yours. when did this site turned into a circlejerk?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.