This mode is popular enough to divide by time control and the rapid format is played in major tournaments as well as blitz. It might make sense to rate them separately. Or at least encourage players to study 960 deeper and have quality games.
5 ratings for bullet, blitz, rapid, classical and correspondence would probably be overkill.
Two is enough to cover the very different nature of 1+0 3+0 and 10+2 or 30+0
It also should be added to the 'Quick Paring' match making also. It's a hassle having to accept weird time controls or big rating gaps just to get a 960 game and to stare at the Lobby. I'd rather tab out and wait for a match.
5 ratings for bullet, blitz, rapid, classical and correspondence would probably be overkill.
Two is enough to cover the very different nature of 1+0 3+0 and 10+2 or 30+0
It also should be added to the 'Quick Paring' match making also. It's a hassle having to accept weird time controls or big rating gaps just to get a 960 game and to stare at the Lobby. I'd rather tab out and wait for a match.